Does CPO kill M8/M9 CCL upgrades — or is that scale-out/scale-up confusion?
Market rumor: CPO cuts ultralow-loss CCL demand. Jeff Pu says upgrade stays — CPO not on compute board soon; NVSwitch still needs high-spec PTFE CCL.
Opening
Pu has the better of the near-term claim: CPO-as-copper-killer is a rumor ahead of board-level evidence.
@freearkshaw relays a market view that CPO on AI servers/switches shifts high-speed signals copper→optical, reducing M8/M9 ultralow-loss CCL demand (even M4 downspecs) and pressuring CCL equities. @sssjeffpu replies that the thesis is theoretically neat but practically wrong near-term: CPO will not hit the compute board soon, and next-year NVSwitch NPO/CPO still uses higher-spec CCL (PTFE + M8/9) — PTFE remains the key thesis. Visible Chinese-language replies lean "far worry, not near worry." Deep tail unread (top-replies).
Sides
FOR — CPO substitution reduces high-end CCL / copper SerDes demand (market rumor)
- @freearkshaw [pseudo] — relays rumor: CPO near ASIC shortens PCB copper runs; 448G generation accelerates optical-for-copper; M8/M9 demand down, possible M4 downspec; CCL board selloff
AGAINST — CCL upgrade path intact near-term (named semis research)
- @sssjeffpu [named] — CPO not on compute board soon; NVSwitch NPO/CPO next year still higher-spec CCL (PTFE + M8/9); PTFE thesis stands
- @hanqing1120 [anon] — market treated scale-out optical substitution as scale-up copper substitution; CPO volumes still small — "远虑不是近忧"
Room: named Asia semis voice (Pu) vs rumor relay + A-share tape commentary; no OEM BOM primary in the visible thread.
Quotes
市场传出观点:CPO 逐步导入 AI 服务器、交换机,高速信号由铜转光,会降低对 M8/M9 超低损耗 CCL 需求,主板规格甚至可下修至 M4;该传言引发盘中覆铜板板块卖压。 — 投研荟 (@freearkshaw)
Re: CCL Upgrade Debate Theoretically right, but practically the CCL upgrade stays.
- CPO won’t hit the compute board anytime soon
- NVSwitch NPO/CPO next year still uses higher-spec CCL (PTFE + M8/9). -> Key thesis is still PTFE — Jeff Pu (@sssjeffpu)
@freearkshaw 市场把Scale-out的光替代当成了Scale-up的铜替代。CPO出货量还小,对CCL的冲击是远虑不是近忧。 — hanqing (@hanqing1120)
What would settle it
OEM / ODM BOM or SemiAnalysis-style teardown showing compute-board CCL grade (M8/M9/PTFE vs downspec) on next NVSwitch / Rubin-class platforms Knowable — next public teardowns / supplier commentary — through 2026-12-15
Public CPO attach rates on AI server vs switch (scale-up vs scale-out) with timing that could move CCL mix in 2026–27 Knowable — supplier earnings / industry maps — through 2026-12-15
Whether Taiwan/China CCL equity moves reverse on primary evidence rather than rumor screenshots Knowable — next 1–2 earnings cycles for major CCL names — through early 2027
The Open/Close · Research commentary, not investment advice. Positions may be held in securities mentioned.